In the first few minutes, Biden hit all the main fear-mongering campaign themes that Democrats plan to run on this fall. Immediately out of the gate, President Joe Biden’s State of the Union address was a cynical, partisan campaign stump speech rather than an uplifting, substantive, unifying message. Perhaps that will be the case here.īut watching as the cheers grew deafening in the hall, one had to wonder: Was it different this time? Can Democrats actually turn this race upside down? Stay tuned … We won’t know for a while, but it is already clear that with Biden’s stewardship, they sense there is fresh hope in the air.ĭavid Gergen is a professor emeritus on public leadership at the Harvard Kennedy School and previously served as a White House adviser to presidents of both parties.Ĭarrie Sheffield: Biden gave a cynical, partisan campaign stump speech Political veterans tend to think that a strong performance at a State of the Union is worth only three or four days of good press before it fades. The more salient question is how much Biden may have changed the odds in the overall race. There were moments when he went over the top, promising more than he could possibly deliver, but Democrats felt energy coursing through their veins again. Passionate, feisty, focused - he came eager to put the gloves on. The Biden who showed up at ringside Thursday night was a completely different kind of animal. Many, myself included, wondered if he could still throw a punch. Democrats - some on his own staff - worried that his age and listless demeanor were dragging him down. His attempt to modernize the military while struggling with the changing nature of warfare during his time resonates with and provides unique insight into the challenges presented by today’s rapidly changing strategic environment.Coming into the State of the Union, Biden was limping along the campaign trail. Roosevelt’s promotion of innovative military technologies, his desire to inject the officer corps with fresh vigor, and his role in building new institutions for command changed the American military landscape. In Command focuses on Roosevelt’s career-long commitment to transforming the military institutions of the United States. Oyos places these developments into broader themes of Progressive Era reform, civil-military tensions, and Roosevelt’s ideas of national cultural vitality and civic duty. Matthew Oyos examines the evolution of Roosevelt’s ideas about military force in the age of industry and explores his drive to promote new institutions of command: technological innovations, militia reform, and international military missions. In Command explores Roosevelt’s efforts to modernize the American military before, during, and after his presidency (1901–9). 2019 Theodore Roosevelt Association Book PrizeĪlthough Theodore Roosevelt was not a wartime president, he took his role as commander in chief very seriously.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |